E-lert Archives
a Selection of the E-lerts Issued by the Watershed Sentinel

Watershed Sentinel E-lert - Get the news about hot issues, which just can't wait until press time. We're very very selective, and use our extensive knowledge of the state of environmental politics to filter this news, just like we carefully select what goes in the Watershed Sentinel magazine. You'll receive an E-lert ONLY when we think your letters might actually make a difference, or there is some effective action you can take immediately. We'll also let you know what the hot topics are in our current issue. Available for subscibers only.

 

2005 and previous E-lerts

Toxic Sludge E-lert

Landspreading of Industrial Waste in BC, Nov 27 2005

They are at it again! The BC government is proposing, after only 30 days internet based consultation, to allow the almost uncontrolled landspreading of pulp mill sludge, lime dregs, and fly ash (that’s the stuff out of the pollution control devices at the top of the stack – they catch the pollution that now BC Environment wants to spread on farmland.)  

The Code of Practice requires testing for only 11 metals – worse than the last time out in 2000, when at least the sludge was required to be tested for all the compounds listed in the Contaminated Sites Act! Even then we protested that this was inadequate because of the mix of compounds in pulp mill sludge: No one knows all of the contaminants in pulp mill sludge. We do know that it contains a variety of heavy metals, and chlorinated and non-chlorinated benzenes and phenolics (PAH) and that the amount appears to vary from sample to sample. Nor does anyone know what the actual environmental impacts of landspreading sludge are, because for almost 25 years, industry across North America has been denying environmentalists’ efforts to get some honest testing done.

The new Code of Practice has no recourse for neighbours of the sludge site, does not require records to be publicly available, and throws the burden on to the medical health officers to object if the application is to agricultural land or within a drinking watershed.  Even then, all the medical health officer could do is request that the Regional Environment Director add additional management standards.

 

Looking at the few criteria the regulation does establish, the presentation may be called at best, disingenuous. The BC Statement Of Intentions For The Code Of Practice says: “Most of these numbers are consistent with the standards for metals in fertilizers and supplements established by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and adopted by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Guidelines for Compost Quality.”

However closer examination reveals that NONE of the metals levels meet the CCME standard for unrestricted or agricultural use, and in the case of mercury the BC reg even exceeds by three times the CCME maximum acceptable level for restricted use! 

The regulation proposes that sludge should be handled in compliance with the Organic Matter Recycling Regulation, primarily intended for sewage sludge not industrial waste, but a ministry audit of 10 Vancouver island sewage sludge operations in 2003-04 found that “Overall, none of the sites met all significant requirements of the OMRR.” Organic Matter Recycling Regulation Audit Report 2003-2004,  http://wlapwww.gov.bc.ca/vir/pp/mun/omrr_audit_03_04.pdf

When the Code of Practice is not working for sewage sludge, why expand the same failures to industrial waste like pulp mill sludge?

This regulation gives industry cheap disposal of its (often toxic) industrial waste by spreading it on farm and forest.

The main problems with this regulation are:

  • Lack of knowledge of what really is in the industrial waste which is proposed for spreading on farmland.
  • Lack of testing
  • Lack of public notification and lack of public recourse
  • What few safeguards and standards there are insufficient, unenforceable and after-the-fact.

For more information about sludge and what we know about it, as well as the historical background to this issue in BC, see

the Reach for Unbleached website at http://www.rfu.org/cacw/pollutionSludge1.htm

For the Government notice see: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epdiv/ema_codes_of_practice/soil_enhance.html

WHAT TO DO

Please email:

barry.penner.mla@leg.bc.ca   

and your local MLA. Contact information is available at:  http://www.legis.gov.bc.ca/mla/3-1-7.htm        

If you can, please write to your local newspaper or any media you have access to.

You can’t easily post your response on the government “consultation” page but you can email it to cindybertram@shaw.ca

Fax: (250) 562-0628
Address: 4, 1462 Rockland Avenue, Victoria, BC V8S 1W1

BC  Minister of Environment Barry Penner
E-mail: barry.penner.mla@leg.bc.ca
Phone: 250 387-1187
Fax: 250 387-1356
PO Box 9047
STN PROV GOVT
Victoria BC V8W 9E2


 

Sablefish E-lert

Sablefish Farms – Neither Wise nor Wanted, October 24 2005

The BC government and the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans are about to approve a sablefish fish farm at “Brew Bay” just north of Robertson Creek and Ha’thayim (von Donop) Park off the coast of Cortes. A similar application is in place for Clayoquot Sound and 35 salmon farms have already had sablefish added to their provincial licenses. Sablefish are also called black cod or butterfish, although they are not.

There are many problems with this.

* Sablefish eat fish – so once again, like salmon, DFO is approving the inherently ludicrous and unsustainable farming of fish which require many pounds of wild fish in order to produce one pound of farmed fish for the table.

* This is an experimental species for fish farming, and there are no models for the amount of waste to be deposited off the Cortes shore, or the disease rate of this species of fish, although the Environmental Assessment seems to expect it to be between 10 and 30% (!) Similarly, no one knows what the antibiotic requirements of these fish will be.

* The waters off Cortes appear to be warmer and not as deep as required for this deep bottom fish, which will lead to more disease and mortality. The water quality assessment is 13 years old.

* The Klahoose First Nation opposes the Cortes site, and the smelt are being raised in a hatchery on Saltspring built on a First Nations archeological site (Walker Hook).

* Friends of Cortes Island asked for a public information process on Cortes almost a year ago.

* In the Canadian Environmental Assessment files, DFO staff raise repeated concerns about habitat destruction, proximity to a rockfish sanctuary and a lack of accountability to make sure wild sablefish are not “laundered” through the fish farms.

* The wild sablefish fishery opposes this farming because they fear disease transmission and that the farmed fish will lower the price for wild black cod.

Your letters to your local paper, and the Vancouver Sun sunletters@png.canwest.com

  will help raise the issue.

           

Also letters to your local MP and MLA will make a difference. Please raise this issue, and ask why we are going down this dangerous road, when we need to stop and assess the situation BEFORE there are economic interests invested. This is not responsible government for a world in the throes of climate change. Let your elected reps know that they need to exercise some prudence.

Hon. Paul Martin, Prime Minister  pm@pm.gc.ca

Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street, Ottawa K1A 0A2    Fax: 613-941-6900

Hon. Gordon Campbell, Premier premier@gov.bc.ca

Room 156, Parliament Buildings, Victoria, BC V8V 1X4

Phone: 250 387-1715 Fax: 250 387-0087

Hon. Geoff Regan, MP, PC, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Regan.G@parl.gc.ca

Hon. Claire Trevena, MLA claire.trevena.mla@leg.bc.ca

Carolyn Deering, Public Registry Officer, Fisheries and Oceans Canada DeeringC@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

Major Projects Review Unit, DFO,

200-401 Burrard St. Vancouver BC V6B 5G3

John Cummins, Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca

The Canadian Sablefish Association has a site which will automatically send a fax/email for you:

http://www.canadiansablefish.com/action.htm

For more information, and a list of other people to write to, see the Georgia Strait Alliance submission to the

http://www.georgiastrait.org/Articles2005/GSA-submission-re-Brew-Bay-Sablefish-Farm.pdf


Food E-lert

The Canadian Food System April 6th 2005



NOW you can help! It’s easy – go to http://www.actionworks.ca/clientfiles/council/actioncentres/beyondfactoryfarming/takeaction.jsp

It’s all set up to send a fast fax to your MP which will make a difference.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop Bill C-27, the CFIA Enforcement Act

If passed, Bill C-27, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) Enforcement Act, will give the CFIA new powers to make regulations that will:

* lock us into the US regulatory system,
* increase privatization of the regulatory system,
* cripple our ability to protect our food system and diversify our trading relationships,
* make it even harder for the family farm and the small food processor to survive because of the CFIA's track record of regulating in the interests of export, trade and promotion of the corporate agri-food sector.

Protect Canada’s food system – tell your Member of Parliament to vote against Bill C-27!


 

Pollution E-lert:
Of Coal And Waste - Nov. 25th, 2003

Pollution in BC has risen by over 400% since 1995 (see www.pollutionwatch.org ).
Meanwhile, three issues threaten to make it worse.

1. CROFTON PULP MILL -- For those living on southern Vancouver Island, Saltspring and the lower mainland:
Don't miss the Crofton Pulp Mill Open House on Thursday Nov. 27th from 4 to 7 at the Crofton Community Hall. The mill wants to gather public reaction to its plans to burn coal, tires and treated railway ties.

2. BURNING COAL is not Pollution Prevention
The coastal pulp industry and the BC government is recommending the burning of coal, and no improvement in emissions for dioxin, to the Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment. This is NOT what the law calls for when it requires that dioxin be virtually eliminated by pollution prevention. The solution, which would protect fish, estuaries AND people, is to take the logs out of the ocean before they soak up too much chlorine.

Write or phone the Hon. David Anderson, Minister of Environment: Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca 250 363-3600 and ask for REAL pollution prevention, not coal burning and greenhouse gasses.

3. NEW BC WASTE ACT OPENS DOOR TO POLLUTION
The BC government plans to remove 80% of pollution permits in favour of voluntary Codes of Practise. Write to your local newspaper and demand that the government maintain a pollution control system which can be monitored and regulated - See New Waste Act Opens Door to Pollution in the new Nov/Dec Watershed Sentinel now.

For details about how BC already leads the nation in toxic pollution, see www.pollutionwatch.org on Thursday Nov. 27th


Proportional Representation Sept. 25, 2003

Federal Members of Parliament will vote on Tuesday September 30th on the NDP's motion to call a referendum to see if Canadians want to change the electoral system to proportional representation.

This will be the first time that parliament has voted on proportional representation in 80 years. See http://www.ndp.ca/changethesystem.html

Please write to your MP, to make sure he or she votes 'yes' to change the system

The NDP has an on-line petition you can send - but good to send your own letter to all federal MPs as well. For a complete email listing which you can copy and paste, see http://www.earthfuture.com/canadianmps. For Island MPs, see below.
Please pass this around as widely as you can.

Vancouver Island MPs:
Victoria - Hon. David Anderson: Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca 250 363-3600

Saanich/Gulf Islands - Mr. Gary Lunn: Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca 250 656 2320

Esquimalt/Juan de Fuca - Dr. Keith Martin: Martin.K@parl.gc.ca 250 474 6505

Nanaimo/Cowichan - Mr. Reed Elley: Elley.R@parl.gc.ca
Nanaimo/ Alberni - Mr. James Lunney: Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca
Vancouver Island North - Mr. John Duncan: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca

West Vancouver/Sunshine Coast - Mr. John Reynolds: Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca


Vancouver Island Generation Project July 8, 2003

July 10 is the BC Utilities Commission deadline for public comment in its approval process for BC Hydro’s proposed Vancouver Island Generation Project (VIGP) – which will burn natural gas to produce electricity. Time is short, so please email your comments to:Robert Pellatt, BCUC Secretary, at:

Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com.

Mark your comments as Re: BCUC review of VIGP.

Tell them NOT to grant approval because BC Hydro has not demonstrated that VIGP is a cost-effective way to meet Vancouver Island’s electricity needs. Energy experts, including the National Energy Board, admit that natural gas production has already peaked and that energy based on natural gas can only cost us more in the future.

For more information, see energy analyst David Hughes’ article, “Running out of Gas,” and the MillWatch section in the current issue of Watershed Sentinel (Vol 13, No. 3). Back issues of the Watershed Sentinel, with numerous articles on the GSX gas pipeline, air pollution and alternative energy are available online at http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/

 

Home    About us    Search    Library    Advertise    Subscribe    Join Us!